Star Trek

Sweet action for kids 'n' cretins. Marjoram and capers.
eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Star Trek

Post by eumaas »

Flex wrote:STAR TREK BEYOND IS GOOD AS HELL FOLKS
I really liked it. Shame about Yelchin.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Silent Majority
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 18756
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.

Re: Star Trek

Post by Silent Majority »

eumaas wrote:
Flex wrote:STAR TREK BEYOND IS GOOD AS HELL FOLKS
I really liked it. Shame about Yelchin.
He was a guy who I was counting on low key enjoying for the next fifty years.
a lifetime serving one machine
Is ten times worse than prison


www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35982
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: Star Trek

Post by Flex »

Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:I really liked it. Shame about Yelchin.
He was a guy who I was counting on low key enjoying for the next fifty years.
Yeah, same.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116687
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Star Trek

Post by Dr. Medulla »

I never watched more than a few episodes of the last season of Enterprise (unfortunately, one of those was the finale), but it's on Netflix, so I've been slowly going thru it. While it's not awful, it's really just rather boring and weighted down by trying to explain future Trek stories. Assuming I'm not completely put off by this season, I'll go back to the start and try it again.

(But, Christ, that theme song is one of the worst things ever. Any review of an episode is mandated to dock at least one letter grade because of that theme.)
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35982
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: Star Trek

Post by Flex »

Dr. Medulla wrote:I never watched more than a few episodes of the last season of Enterprise (unfortunately, one of those was the finale), but it's on Netflix, so I've been slowly going thru it. While it's not awful, it's really just rather boring and weighted down by trying to explain future Trek stories. Assuming I'm not completely put off by this season, I'll go back to the start and try it again.

(But, Christ, that theme song is one of the worst things ever. Any review of an episode is mandated to dock at least one letter grade because of that theme.)
I think I just felt numb by the time I got to that final season. I did not cotton to the "prequel stories season" idea at all. Just a whole season of weird, unnecessary fan service.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116687
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Star Trek

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Flex wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:I never watched more than a few episodes of the last season of Enterprise (unfortunately, one of those was the finale), but it's on Netflix, so I've been slowly going thru it. While it's not awful, it's really just rather boring and weighted down by trying to explain future Trek stories. Assuming I'm not completely put off by this season, I'll go back to the start and try it again.

(But, Christ, that theme song is one of the worst things ever. Any review of an episode is mandated to dock at least one letter grade because of that theme.)
I think I just felt numb by the time I got to that final season. I did not cotton to the "prequel stories season" idea at all. Just a whole season of weird, unnecessary fan service.
Pretty much. Like an admission that the concept didn't have any natural juice of its own, so it went for the nerdiest of nerds who prize continuity above all else.
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Silent Majority
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 18756
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.

Re: Star Trek

Post by Silent Majority »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Flex wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:I never watched more than a few episodes of the last season of Enterprise (unfortunately, one of those was the finale), but it's on Netflix, so I've been slowly going thru it. While it's not awful, it's really just rather boring and weighted down by trying to explain future Trek stories. Assuming I'm not completely put off by this season, I'll go back to the start and try it again.

(But, Christ, that theme song is one of the worst things ever. Any review of an episode is mandated to dock at least one letter grade because of that theme.)
I think I just felt numb by the time I got to that final season. I did not cotton to the "prequel stories season" idea at all. Just a whole season of weird, unnecessary fan service.
Pretty much. Like an admission that the concept didn't have any natural juice of its own, so it went for the nerdiest of nerds who prize continuity above all else.
I just remembered that I know how Enterprise ends. Hah.
a lifetime serving one machine
Is ten times worse than prison


www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Star Trek

Post by eumaas »

I hated that damn show, and I gave up at the end of the first season. Never seen the rest of it.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116687
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Star Trek

Post by Dr. Medulla »

eumaas wrote:I hated that damn show, and I gave up at the end of the first season. Never seen the rest of it.
My memory of the 3rd season—the one driven by the Sept 11-like attack by a genocidal alien race—is that it was okay. Or at least had purpose, which is what that show always seemed to lack (both in story and characters). Better than the first seasons of TNG or DS9, anyway (file under: Tallest Midget).
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35982
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: Star Trek

Post by Flex »

Dr. Medulla wrote:My memory of the 3rd season—the one driven by the Sept 11-like attack by a genocidal alien race—is that it was okay. Or at least had purpose, which is what that show always seemed to lack (both in story and characters). Better than the first seasons of TNG or DS9, anyway (file under: Tallest Midget).
I actually think the first couple of seasons of DS9 are underrated - they were figuring their shit out for sure, but the idea that we were gonna see Starfleet involved in a civil rebuilding project is a pretty interesting one. When it worked, it was great. There's no way to know if the writing would have solidified under the show's original course, but the pivot to the dominion war made for entertaining, but ultimately more conventional, television. Which isn't to say DS9 didn't get better starting in season three - it definitely did - but I think the show actually started with a more ambitious and unique premise than what they eventually settled on (and occasionally delivered on), which should count for something.

Josh Marsfelder's thought provoking rehabilitation of season one TNG aside, I agree that show didn't really land on a coherent vision of what it should be about until season three.

I recall being somewhat keen on Enterprise season three when I first watched it (documented in this thread somewhere, no doubt), but I just can't fathom a scenario where I rewatch it and find it's aged at all well.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116687
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Star Trek

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Flex wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:My memory of the 3rd season—the one driven by the Sept 11-like attack by a genocidal alien race—is that it was okay. Or at least had purpose, which is what that show always seemed to lack (both in story and characters). Better than the first seasons of TNG or DS9, anyway (file under: Tallest Midget).
I actually think the first couple of seasons of DS9 are underrated - they were figuring their shit out for sure, but the idea that we were gonna see Starfleet involved in a civil rebuilding project is a pretty interesting one. When it worked, it was great. There's no way to know if the writing would have solidified under the show's original course, but the pivot to the dominion war made for entertaining, but ultimately more conventional, television. Which isn't to say DS9 didn't get better starting in season three - it definitely did - but I think the show actually started with a more ambitious and unique premise than what they eventually settled on (and occasionally delivered on), which should count for something.
Definitely, DS9 was ambitious and had a clear purpose from the start—even apart from being different in tone from previous Trek—but it lumbers along and emphasizes the "we're all suspicious of each other" angle too hard. It's rough watching when everyone seems snarly toward each other. Plus, and this is my own personal lack of interest, crap about Bajoran spirituality was boring as fuck.
I recall being somewhat keen on Enterprise season three when I first watched it (documented in this thread somewhere, no doubt), but I just can't fathom a scenario where I rewatch it and find it's aged at all well.
My recollection was that the first third or half of the season wasn't terribly engaging, but then it became clearer that these things were all tying in together and I became much more interested to see how it would play out.
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Star Trek

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:Plus, and this is my own personal lack of interest, crap about Bajoran spirituality was boring as fuck.
True, but Bareil was cool.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35982
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: Star Trek

Post by Flex »

eumaas wrote:True, but Bareil was cool.
#TeamBareil #Bareil4eva #YaaaassssBareil

Addendum: #Bareilonfleek
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Star Trek

Post by eumaas »

Flex wrote:
eumaas wrote:True, but Bareil was cool.
#TeamBareil #Bareil4eva #YaaaassssBareil
"Remember Bareil?" is an in-joke between me and Kim. Long after his death, we'd be watching some ep, and at a slow moment would pipe in with that question.

Also deployed whenever Kira is having a romantic moment.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116687
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Star Trek

Post by Dr. Medulla »

eumaas wrote:
Flex wrote:
eumaas wrote:True, but Bareil was cool.
#TeamBareil #Bareil4eva #YaaaassssBareil
"Remember Bareil?" is an in-joke between me and Kim. Long after his death, we'd be watching some ep, and at a slow moment would pipe in with that question.

Also deployed whenever Kira is having a romantic moment.
Didn't his death inspire an uncomfortable wailing from Kira?
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Post Reply