Big Foot
Re: Big Foot
You know, he's got a point there...
God, what a mess, on the ladder of success
Where you take one step and miss the whole first rung
Where you take one step and miss the whole first rung
- tepista
- Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
- Posts: 37917
- Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
- Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one
Re: Big Foot
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
- tepista
- Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
- Posts: 37917
- Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
- Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one
Re: Big Foot
Hooks in the tub
- Attachments
-
- sasq2.jpg (31.99 KiB) Viewed 191 times
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116749
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Big Foot
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Big Foot
Two authors apparently.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116749
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Big Foot
It's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Big Foot
Especially true in pop music. It's harder, even.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
"Suck our Earth dick, Martians!" —Doc
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116749
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Big Foot
One of the things that made me reconsider formula work was after reading a study of romance readers. To non-fans, it's the same damn thing, over and over. Completely lazy and encourages passivity in the reader. To the fan, tho, yeah, there is a formula but the pleasure comes from the little tweaks, the unexpected little touches. The non-fan misses that altogether, so it only works if you're well-versed in the formula. So it should be approached not vertically—"creative" or "original" work as superior to formula—but rather horizontally—a different approach to narrative.Kory wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 3:56pmEspecially true in pop music. It's harder, even.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Big Foot
When my son was little he would come home from school with these books. Like monster and hero fantasy stories. In each book the hero had a new sidekick as he went on a quest to kill the monster that was plaguing a village. Very much a formula, different monster, sidekick and village but more or less the same story. There was probably 30 of these books at the time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116749
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Big Foot
But, seemingly, there was enough going on that your boy wanted to experience the different versions.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 7:39pmWhen my son was little he would come home from school with these books. Like monster and hero fantasy stories. In each book the hero had a new sidekick as he went on a quest to kill the monster that was plaguing a village. Very much a formula, different monster, sidekick and village but more or less the same story. There was probably 30 of these books at the time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Big Foot
He was pretty young and getting into reading. Eventually he caught on. It sort of reminds me of watching Gilligan's Island as a kid.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 8:05pmBut, seemingly, there was enough going on that your boy wanted to experience the different versions.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 7:39pmWhen my son was little he would come home from school with these books. Like monster and hero fantasy stories. In each book the hero had a new sidekick as he went on a quest to kill the monster that was plaguing a village. Very much a formula, different monster, sidekick and village but more or less the same story. There was probably 30 of these books at the time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
But I guess what you were getting at and which applies pretty much across the board is that you use these exercises to find out what works and wha doesn't. Its practice or rough drafts. Hopefully gets you in a good position for when you get your big chance or whatever. You eliminate some variables and tweak things you want to improve.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116749
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Big Foot
As much as anything, I'm suspicious of the importance of being distinct and original and all that. Yes, creativity is important, but if the standard is so high as to dissuade you—you're not being original enough—that's a trap that leads you to passivity. Fuck, I say that even as that's exactly my problem and why I don't write much (apart from here, of course). So formula isn't proof of inadequacy or being a hack. It's expression like anything else.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 8:18pmHe was pretty young and getting into reading. Eventually he caught on. It sort of reminds me of watching Gilligan's Island as a kid.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 8:05pmBut, seemingly, there was enough going on that your boy wanted to experience the different versions.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 7:39pmWhen my son was little he would come home from school with these books. Like monster and hero fantasy stories. In each book the hero had a new sidekick as he went on a quest to kill the monster that was plaguing a village. Very much a formula, different monster, sidekick and village but more or less the same story. There was probably 30 of these books at the time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pmIt's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
But I guess what you were getting at and which applies pretty much across the board is that you use these exercises to find out what works and wha doesn't. Its practice or rough drafts. Hopefully gets you in a good position for when you get your big chance or whatever. You eliminate some variables and tweak things you want to improve.
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Big Foot
Id equate it to like batting practice. The best hitters take BP all the time (so do shitty ones). Im sure there's better anaolgies. Its skills and you need to develop some and keep some fresh.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 9:32pmAs much as anything, I'm suspicious of the importance of being distinct and original and all that. Yes, creativity is important, but if the standard is so high as to dissuade you—you're not being original enough—that's a trap that leads you to passivity. Fuck, I say that even as that's exactly my problem and why I don't write much (apart from here, of course). So formula isn't proof of inadequacy or being a hack. It's expression like anything else.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 8:18pmHe was pretty young and getting into reading. Eventually he caught on. It sort of reminds me of watching Gilligan's Island as a kid.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 8:05pmBut, seemingly, there was enough going on that your boy wanted to experience the different versions.revbob wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 7:39pmWhen my son was little he would come home from school with these books. Like monster and hero fantasy stories. In each book the hero had a new sidekick as he went on a quest to kill the monster that was plaguing a village. Very much a formula, different monster, sidekick and village but more or less the same story. There was probably 30 of these books at the time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 1:43pm
It's a skill to be able to do that. There was a notable scifi writer in the 50s or 60s who, apart from his more serious, creative writing, could pump out trashy novels of maybe 30–40K words in length every four days or so. It was easy money for him and, he said, helped him become more disciplined in his other work. Formulaic writing is dismissed as lacking ability, but it's actually a different kind of ability.
But I guess what you were getting at and which applies pretty much across the board is that you use these exercises to find out what works and wha doesn't. Its practice or rough drafts. Hopefully gets you in a good position for when you get your big chance or whatever. You eliminate some variables and tweak things you want to improve.