WW III poll
Re: WW III poll
I don't think they will actually do it this time. I think the announcement this morning was something of a warning to Iran. Hopefully, that will take care of things.
Got a Rake? Sure!
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy
- SteveSatch
- Junco Partner
- Posts: 379
- Joined: 18 Jun 2008, 3:33am
Re: WW III poll
They shouldn't bomb the cities or the people, but they should bomb the nuke facilities they are building. Iran is a terror sponsoring state that is currently supplying weapons that kill U.S. soldiers and they want Israel and the U.S. wiped off the planet. They must not get nukes at all costs. Iran has been trying to get the U.S. into a war since '79 and they certainly deserve an ass kicking but I don't think there will be an all out war with them unless they aren't stopped from getting nukes and they end up using them on Israel. I doubt the U.S. even has the guts to bomb the nuke facilities. Israel will most likely bomb the nuke facilities at some point if the U.S. doesn't step up. Israel doesn't really have the bombers to do it, they have fighter jets not bombers. I'm also not sure if their fighters have the range to attack them and make it back.
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35949
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: WW III poll
When I was in Washington, a briefing I attended indicated this was more or less the thinking on the Hill. Better to do whatever we have to over there (even if it means another Iraq) rather than face a state like Iran having nuclear weapons.SteveSatch wrote:They shouldn't bomb the cities or the people, but they should bomb the nuke facilities they are building. Iran is a terror sponsoring state that is currently supplying weapons that kill U.S. soldiers and they want Israel and the U.S. wiped off the planet. They must not get nukes at all costs. Iran has been trying to get the U.S. into a war since '79 and they certainly deserve an ass kicking but I don't think there will be an all out war with them unless they aren't stopped from getting nukes and they end up using them on Israel. I doubt the U.S. even has the guts to bomb the nuke facilities. Israel will most likely bomb the nuke facilities at some point if the U.S. doesn't step up. Israel doesn't really have the bombers to do it, they have fighter jets not bombers. I'm also not sure if their fighters have the range to attack them and make it back.
Regardless, fighting two hot wars (Afghanistan & Iraq) plus the nebulous "War on Terror" has limited our options on what we can do in Iran. The choice may be effectively out of our hands.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- SteveSatch
- Junco Partner
- Posts: 379
- Joined: 18 Jun 2008, 3:33am
Re: WW III poll
Fighting Iran instead of Iraq in the first place would have made a lot more sense. Sadam was a son of a bitch murderer who killed and oppressed his own people, but that really was the problem of the people of Iraq. Sort it out yourselves. He really wasn't a threat to the people here in the U.S. Iran is.
- BostonBeaneater
- Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
- Posts: 11953
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
- Location: Between the moon and New York City
Re: WW III poll
I agree, Saddam was a side show. These assholes in charge of our country wanted a quick will and he seemed to be easy to kick over. He was easy to kick over but they had no ralistic plan for the aftermath.
Iran can be defeated with blue jeans and other culture bombs. Most Iranians are good people who live under a shity government (like us kind of). They may dream of a better government but we should not think for a second that they would stand and fight us if attacked.
I support Israel's right to exist but I would not fight a war for them. They need to make peace with their neighbors. Their neighbors need to grow up and stop using their children as bombs.
Iran can be defeated with blue jeans and other culture bombs. Most Iranians are good people who live under a shity government (like us kind of). They may dream of a better government but we should not think for a second that they would stand and fight us if attacked.
I support Israel's right to exist but I would not fight a war for them. They need to make peace with their neighbors. Their neighbors need to grow up and stop using their children as bombs.
Re: WW III poll
Iran launches missiles, Israel launches missiles no more Middle East problem. Iran uses a third party to detonate a nuclear device in Israel Israel wipes Iran from the map. Unfortunately, all this saber rattling, chest thumping and rhetoric is enough of an excuse for Bush to bomb Iran before he leaves office (which, by the way, the Israeli press is convinced he'll do). And will the US be safer? Hardly. We'll just give Islamic extremists more reasons to strike at us anyway they can.
Re: WW III poll
If Israel is going to strike, do they do it before Obama takes office? (So they won't piss him off needlessly.) If so, November or December could be eventful one moonless night. If McCain wins, they might wait another six months.
- 101Walterton
- The Best
- Posts: 21973
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 5:36pm
- Location: Volcanic Rock In The Pacific
Re: WW III poll
Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
Re: WW III poll
Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
- Wolter
- Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
- Posts: 55432
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
- Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Re: WW III poll
More importantly: they're Jews. Do we really want JEWS to have the bomb?revbob wrote:Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116595
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: WW III poll
If every nation had nukes, everyone would be too scared to use them, so free access to nuclear weapons would make us all safer. That's just common sense.revbob wrote:Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: WW III poll
No it's MAD I tell you MAD!!!!!!!!!Dr. Medulla wrote:If every nation had nukes, everyone would be too scared to use them, so free access to nuclear weapons would make us all safer. That's just common sense.revbob wrote:Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116595
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: WW III poll
A madhouse, a MADHOUSE!?revbob wrote:No it's MAD I tell you MAD!!!!!!!!!Dr. Medulla wrote:If every nation had nukes, everyone would be too scared to use them, so free access to nuclear weapons would make us all safer. That's just common sense.revbob wrote:Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Wolter
- Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
- Posts: 55432
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
- Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Re: WW III poll
Look, everyone should have nuclear weapons and receive training in their safe use. That's the only way to stop the lawlessness inherent in all people.Dr. Medulla wrote:A madhouse, a MADHOUSE!?revbob wrote:No it's MAD I tell you MAD!!!!!!!!!Dr. Medulla wrote:If every nation had nukes, everyone would be too scared to use them, so free access to nuclear weapons would make us all safer. That's just common sense.revbob wrote:Because America is a responsible steward of nuclear weapons. You can rest assured that they would only use them if it was really necessary. I'm pretty sure it's in the bible. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!101Walterton wrote:Why can America have nuclear weapons but not Iran ?
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"