Re: The Future of the Republican Party
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 12:12pm
I think if it was just the biographical lies he'd have gotten away with it, but the federal crimes start getting to be a bit much.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
Lies all lies I tell ya.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
Yup, that’s exactly it. It’s getting into Nixon resignation mode, where he knew he was going to go down, so you start figuring out how to cut a deal.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:47pmI think if it was just the biographical lies he'd have gotten away with it, but the federal crimes start getting to be a bit much.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
He's like Richard Nixon and Abe Simpson rolled into one.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 1:56pmYup, that’s exactly it. It’s getting into Nixon resignation mode, where he knew he was going to go down, so you start figuring out how to cut a deal.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:47pmI think if it was just the biographical lies he'd have gotten away with it, but the federal crimes start getting to be a bit much.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
msza2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 4:33pmHe's like Richard Nixon and Abe Simpson rolled into one.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 1:56pmYup, that’s exactly it. It’s getting into Nixon resignation mode, where he knew he was going to go down, so you start figuring out how to cut a deal.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:47pmI think if it was just the biographical lies he'd have gotten away with it, but the federal crimes start getting to be a bit much.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
"I am not a crook. I may be a fraud, a con man, a crook, but I am NOT a drag queen!"
I think he said he's Stonecutter-ish.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 4:51pmmsza2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 4:33pmHe's like Richard Nixon and Abe Simpson rolled into one.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 1:56pmYup, that’s exactly it. It’s getting into Nixon resignation mode, where he knew he was going to go down, so you start figuring out how to cut a deal.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:47pmI think if it was just the biographical lies he'd have gotten away with it, but the federal crimes start getting to be a bit much.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
"I am not a crook. I may be a fraud, a con man, a crook, but I am NOT a drag queen!"
(Has Santos identified himself as a Stonecutter or a No Homers member yet?)
Damn, you're rolling!msza2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 5:29pmI think he said he's Stonecutter-ish.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 4:51pmmsza2 wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 4:33pmHe's like Richard Nixon and Abe Simpson rolled into one.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 1:56pmYup, that’s exactly it. It’s getting into Nixon resignation mode, where he knew he was going to go down, so you start figuring out how to cut a deal.
"I am not a crook. I may be a fraud, a con man, a crook, but I am NOT a drag queen!"
(Has Santos identified himself as a Stonecutter or a No Homers member yet?)
Hmm, pathological liar "says" he's off of committees, I guess we'll have to wait and see if he's turned over a new leaf and is telling the truth.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
Sparky wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 6:40pmHmm, pathological liar "says" he's off of committees, I guess we'll have to wait and see if he's turned over a new leaf and is telling the truth.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jan 2023, 12:12pmhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/george-s ... 0c7e05f457
Writing is on the wall …
Kimmel loses any credibility (to the degree that he had any) to be a critic of politics by validating these assholes in any way. Putting them on the air to interview them, even in a mocking way, does normalize them.
Agreed it provides legitimacy that he doesn't deserve. No doubt some people watched that and soon found themselves descending into a rabbit hole of conspiratorial nonsense and came out as believers. It like a version of that asshole messing up Trump's hair on his talk show. The host got played.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 7:25amKimmel loses any credibility (to the degree that he had any) to be a critic of politics by validating these assholes in any way. Putting them on the air to interview them, even in a mocking way, does normalize them.
Lindell knew he was going to be laughed at but didn't care. The point is staying in the conversation. If you've got a forum, you're in the game. But that's the profit motive at work. Kimmel et al don't give a fuck about validating these people, only the ratings.revbob wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 8:31amAgreed it provides legitimacy that he doesn't deserve. No doubt some people watched that and soon found themselves descending into a rabbit hole of conspiratorial nonsense and came out as believers. It like a version of that asshole messing up Trump's hair on his talk show. The host got played.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 7:25amKimmel loses any credibility (to the degree that he had any) to be a critic of politics by validating these assholes in any way. Putting them on the air to interview them, even in a mocking way, does normalize them.