I actually hadn't heard of that full LGBT acronym. Apparently the last A stands for ally. Come on, straight people don't need to be included.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:52amAgreed. It invited misinterpretation, intentional and not. Black Lives Matter also makes it easy for opponents to twist it into *only* Black Lives Matter, instead of its intent of Black Lives Matter, too. And the insane alphabet stew of covering non-conventional gender identities. I support the desire for inclusivity in naming, but LGBTQQIP2SAA (I think that's the current version) suggests more zeal than intent to persuade.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
Police Misconduct: Tracked
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
Wait, that's not made up? Last I'd heard was LGBTQIA+ (the a standing for asexual). Seems like the definition of performative, corporate friendly "inclusion" to just keep adding letters without discussing structural oppression.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
Then just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pmI mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
But it's all about demonstrating inclusion. Everyone gets a letter in the acronym!matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:52pmI actually hadn't heard of that full LGBT acronym. Apparently the last A stands for ally. Come on, straight people don't need to be included.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:52amAgreed. It invited misinterpretation, intentional and not. Black Lives Matter also makes it easy for opponents to twist it into *only* Black Lives Matter, instead of its intent of Black Lives Matter, too. And the insane alphabet stew of covering non-conventional gender identities. I support the desire for inclusivity in naming, but LGBTQQIP2SAA (I think that's the current version) suggests more zeal than intent to persuade.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
It reminds a bit of this Carlin rant:
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
What happens when a police department has a budget of $0 (i.e. has been defunded)?matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:58pmThen just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pmI mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
Addendum: yeah, we're not really disagreeing. I guess I just think the slogan is fine to mean what it says, it's when the pro-cop "reformists" decided it was a good expression for some reason that things got muddied.
Last edited by Flex on 30 Jan 2023, 1:11pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
It has to move in with its girlfriend?Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:02pmWhat happens when a police department has a budget of $0 (i.e. has been defunded)?matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:58pmThen just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pmI mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
Well there is partial defunding and total defunding. Again, the slogan sucks.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:02pmWhat happens when a police department has a budget of $0 (i.e. has been defunded)?matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:58pmThen just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pmI mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 11:38am"Defund the Police" was terrible branding. Just awful.WestwayKid wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 10:59am
The 2020 "Defund the Police" Summer has passed and become a dirty word.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
If the "reformists" hadn't attached themselves to the slogan, would there really be any ambiguity about what it means? It's a fine slogan to mean 'get rid of the police" (it's actually the only logical reading of it! I mean, the word "partial" or any other conditional language is just read into it by people who want it to be something it doesn't imho), but yeah it's a bad slogan for the incremental reforms that most people are talking about (many of which INCREASE police budgets).matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:11pmWell there is partial defunding and total defunding. Again, the slogan sucks.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:02pmWhat happens when a police department has a budget of $0 (i.e. has been defunded)?matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:58pmThen just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pmI mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
Addendum: I'm not arguing it's not a "bad" slogan. I'm just arguing it's bad because it actually HAS a pretty clear meaning: get rid of the police. Most regular people understand that - it's one of the reasons it's so incredibly unpopular! - and the liberal "reformists" hitching their wagon to such a radical slogan were incalculably idiotic.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
If the aim is to abolish the police, there's your slogan—direct and demanding. Defund is both an ambiguous and weaselly word, describing process rather ambition.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:18pmIf the "reformists" hadn't attached themselves to the slogan, would there really be any ambiguity about what it means? It's a fine slogan to mean 'get rid of the police" (it's actually the only logical reading of it! I mean, the word "partial" or any other conditional language is just read into it by people who want it to be something it doesn't imho), but yeah it's a bad slogan for the incremental reforms that most people are talking about (many of which INCREASE police budgets).matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:11pmWell there is partial defunding and total defunding. Again, the slogan sucks.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:02pmWhat happens when a police department has a budget of $0 (i.e. has been defunded)?matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:58pmThen just say "abolish the police." I thought defund meant basically broad reform and reallocation of funding to services that are better suited to deal with things like mental health crises, etc.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 12:25pm
I mean, that depends. I think it was weird, bad branding for people who wanted police reform but not abolition, but it's very accurate branding for actual police abolitionists. It's just a really, really unpopular position and it always struck me as totally delusional that a lot of abolitionists (at least ones I knew or followed) acted like it was a broadly popular position that wouldn't require absolutely mind boggling levels of outreach and persuasion.
I don't really understand people who didn't actually want to get rid of police using the term tho. Very counterproductive!
I guess we are proving the point that the branding was bad if we still can't agree on what it means.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
I thought the problem was that too many people (correctly) believe defund the police means get rid of them. How is that too vague?
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
It's ambiguous because it invites others to seize it and say defund the police budget in areas they shouldn't handle (e.g., mental health crises). When the word choice describes a process, it invites competing ideas of the ends. "Ban the Bomb" or "Restrict Resources for Nuclear Weapons"?
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
I'm not convinced that "Defund the Police" started out as synonymous with "Abolish the Police." Skimming the wikipedia entry (that's about the depth I can muster during work hours) seems to align with the general reform/not abolish take on the phrase that I understood. I also do remember a separate "abolish the police" slogan during 2020/2021 which further obfuscates the issue.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
Again, the proof seems to be I the pudding: America, correctly imho, believe defund the police means "get rid of the police." Nobody seems that confused. They just hate the idea of getting rid of the police!Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:38pmIt's ambiguous because it invites others to seize it and say defund the police budget in areas they shouldn't handle (e.g., mental health crises). When the word choice describes a process, it invites competing ideas of the ends. "Ban the Bomb" or "Restrict Resources for Nuclear Weapons"?
Look, I don't even really disagree that the slogan could be better for the reasons you say I just don't think its massive unpopularity is because it's too vague. I think most people pretty much get it! And hate what it means! That's a huge hurdle that the movement needs to overcome and it worries me that the focus is just fiddling around with the slogan. Police abolitionism has a lot bigger hills to climb than just picking abolish vs defund for the t-shirts.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35948
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
They call themselves an abolitionist movement right on the website: https://defundthepolice.org/about/matedog wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:43pmI'm not convinced that "Defund the Police" started out as synonymous with "Abolish the Police." Skimming the wikipedia entry (that's about the depth I can muster during work hours) seems to align with the general reform/not abolish take on the phrase that I understood. I also do remember a separate "abolish the police" slogan during 2020/2021 which further obfuscates the issue.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Police Misconduct: Tracked
I think our difference is my focus on people who fall somewhere on the change side (my apologies for losing sight of this). The branding of the abolish movement is suitably vague that it invites reformists to claim the slogan for themselves and muddy the waters and make the whole thing seem ill-conceived.Flex wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:47pmAgain, the proof seems to be I the pudding: America, correctly imho, believe defund the police means "get rid of the police." Nobody seems that confused. They just hate the idea of getting rid of the police!Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑30 Jan 2023, 1:38pmIt's ambiguous because it invites others to seize it and say defund the police budget in areas they shouldn't handle (e.g., mental health crises). When the word choice describes a process, it invites competing ideas of the ends. "Ban the Bomb" or "Restrict Resources for Nuclear Weapons"?
Look, I don't even really disagree that the slogan could be better for the reasons you say I just don't think its massive unpopularity is because it's too vague. I think most people pretty much get it! And hate what it means! That's a huge hurdle that the movement needs to overcome and it worries me that the focus is just fiddling around with the slogan. Police abolitionism has a lot bigger hills to climb than just picking abolish vs defund for the t-shirts.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft