Page 8 of 17

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 10:24pm
by Heston
One of my favourite books...

Image

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 10:29pm
by Flex
Heston wrote:One of my favourite books...

http://images.borders.com.au/images/bau ... e-moon.jpg
Mathematical!

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 10:47pm
by 101Walterton
Heston wrote:
Purple Hayes wrote:
101Walterton wrote:Can't they resolve this once and for all by finding that flag and all the crap they left behind (including the footprints and tyre tracks etc..which will apparently still be there) with one of those fancy telescopes ?
Easy you'd have thought, so why not then ? As someone woken up as a small child to watch the moon landing it would really put my mind to rest, still can't get my head around how they did it way back then or on the other hand how so many people could lie about it....... I don't pretend to understand the science involved but surely in the 21st century we could nail it as an absolute known truth or just another piece of propaganda bullshit? :huh:
What we achieved 43 years ago in science should be a doddle today. That's why I remain perplexed.
Exactly and I really hope it is true. I did read an article by Japanese scientist who said that the Japanese were going to travel to the moon however discovered that it would be impossible for man to survive the heat or radiation or something which is why they haven't done it. They land on planets much further away all the time surely going to the moon and back nowadays would be a piece of piss. I'm suprised McDonalds haven't done it just to put a huge advertising banner up there you could see from earth, imagine that !!!

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 11:32pm
by Flex
I'm posting in this thread to help Wolter's brain thing.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 11:32pm
by Flex
I'm posting in this thread to help Wolter's brain thing.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 10 May 2012, 11:51pm
by Wolter
Flex wrote:I'm posting in this thread to help Wolter's brain thing.
I already did.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 3:22am
by Marky Dread
Heston wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Purple Hayes wrote:
101Walterton wrote:Can't they resolve this once and for all by finding that flag and all the crap they left behind (including the footprints and tyre tracks etc..which will apparently still be there) with one of those fancy telescopes ?
Easy you'd have thought, so why not then ? As someone woken up as a small child to watch the moon landing it would really put my mind to rest, still can't get my head around how they did it way back then or on the other hand how so many people could lie about it....... I don't pretend to understand the science involved but surely in the 21st century we could nail it as an absolute known truth or just another piece of propaganda bullshit? :huh:
As far as I'm concerned it is an absolute known truth. Or, as close as that can be.
It would be different if Russia had got there first.
In truth the Americans would not have been able to land on the moon without the aid of Nazi scientists captured in WWII.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 3:46am
by Marky Dread
Flex has the technology and his armies are taking over.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17905533

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 4:38pm
by 101Walterton
Marky Dread wrote:
Heston wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Purple Hayes wrote:
101Walterton wrote:Can't they resolve this once and for all by finding that flag and all the crap they left behind (including the footprints and tyre tracks etc..which will apparently still be there) with one of those fancy telescopes ?
Easy you'd have thought, so why not then ? As someone woken up as a small child to watch the moon landing it would really put my mind to rest, still can't get my head around how they did it way back then or on the other hand how so many people could lie about it....... I don't pretend to understand the science involved but surely in the 21st century we could nail it as an absolute known truth or just another piece of propaganda bullshit? :huh:
As far as I'm concerned it is an absolute known truth. Or, as close as that can be.
It would be different if Russia had got there first.
In truth the Americans would not have been able to land on the moon without the aid of Nazi scientists captured in WWII.
That's true, the astronaut may have been American but NASA technology wasn't, the Nazi's were half way there in 1945.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 4:49pm
by Dr. Medulla
101Walterton wrote:That's true, the astronaut may have been American but NASA technology wasn't, the Nazi's were half way there in 1945.
Launching missiles from Germany to London was not "half way" by any stretch. Yes, the Germans were pioneers in rocketry, but let's not exaggerate the state of the technology in 1945.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 5:21pm
by Marky Dread
Dr. Medulla wrote:
101Walterton wrote:That's true, the astronaut may have been American but NASA technology wasn't, the Nazi's were half way there in 1945.
Launching missiles from Germany to London was not "half way" by any stretch. Yes, the Germans were pioneers in rocketry, but let's not exaggerate the state of the technology in 1945.
You have seen the opening sequence to Hellboy? those Nazi's had a portal and everything man.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 10:46pm
by 101Walterton
Dr. Medulla wrote:
101Walterton wrote:That's true, the astronaut may have been American but NASA technology wasn't, the Nazi's were half way there in 1945.
Launching missiles from Germany to London was not "half way" by any stretch. Yes, the Germans were pioneers in rocketry, but let's not exaggerate the state of the technology in 1945.
OK, 17.8 % of the way there :mrgreen:

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 11 May 2012, 11:40pm
by matedog
101Walterton wrote:Can't they resolve this once and for all by finding that flag and all the crap they left behind (including the footprints and tyre tracks etc..which will apparently still be there) with one of those fancy telescopes ?
According to cursory Internet search, no. Those fancy telescopes are not capable of dOing that.

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 12 May 2012, 12:38am
by 101Walterton
matedog wrote:
101Walterton wrote:Can't they resolve this once and for all by finding that flag and all the crap they left behind (including the footprints and tyre tracks etc..which will apparently still be there) with one of those fancy telescopes ?
According to cursory Internet search, no. Those fancy telescopes are not capable of dOing that.
What if they were 17.8% of the way there in their Nazi spaceship ?

Re: Did man land on the moon?

Posted: 27 Dec 2014, 6:29am
by Heston