Page 20 of 23

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 3:37pm
by Kory
Rat Patrol wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted that you deleted that post. :shifty:
I'm gutted that you're gutted.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 3:41pm
by Wolter
Kory wrote:
Rat Patrol wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted that you deleted that post. :shifty:
I'm gutted that you're gutted.
Do I need to blow on the pie?

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 11:31pm
by Marky Dread
Wolter wrote:
Kory wrote:
Rat Patrol wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted that you deleted that post. :shifty:
I'm gutted that you're gutted.
Do I need to blow on the pie?
I'm gutted for the pie.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 11:41pm
by 101Walterton
Marky Dread wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Kory wrote:
Rat Patrol wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted that you deleted that post. :shifty:
I'm gutted that you're gutted.
Do I need to blow on the pie?
I'm gutted for the pie.
We need a safer community.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 11:46pm
by rcs
101Walterton wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Kory wrote:
Rat Patrol wrote: I'm gutted that you deleted that post. :shifty:
I'm gutted that you're gutted.
Do I need to blow on the pie?
I'm gutted for the pie.
We need a safer community.
thermo-nuclear

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 23 Jan 2011, 4:38pm
by Marcus G
Mmmm. Pie.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 23 Jan 2011, 9:42pm
by Chuck Mangione
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
What kind?

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 23 Jan 2011, 9:55pm
by Wolter
Chuck Mangione wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
What kind?
Thermonuclear.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 2:27pm
by Marky Dread
Wolter wrote:
Chuck Mangione wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
What kind?
Thermonuclear.
That's a lot of blowing.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 2:28pm
by Wolter
Marky Dread wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Chuck Mangione wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
What kind?
Thermonuclear.
That's a lot of blowing.
This community isn't going to ensafen itself.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 7:03pm
by Kory
Wolter wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Chuck Mangione wrote:
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
What kind?
Thermonuclear.
That's a lot of blowing.
This community isn't going to ensafen itself.
I'm going to mark that down in the IMCT lexicon.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 8:17am
by rudebhoy
finished the book this morning, thought it was a great read overall, but like someone else said, did get a little bit bored by some of the stuff about chord structures and guitar effects, but given it's a book for Clash nuts rather than casual readers, can see that some folk would want to see that.

My only real criticism is with the stuff about Sandinista and what they did after the band split - it's a very high-level canter through, and there is nothing that will be new to 99% of readers.

But, like I say, overall a top read, best Clash book there is, and I've read them all :mrgreen:

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 3:15pm
by 101Walterton
rudebhoy wrote:finished the book this morning, thought it was a great read overall, but like someone else said, did get a little bit bored by some of the stuff about chord structures and guitar effects, but given it's a book for Clash nuts rather than casual readers, can see that some folk would want to see that.

My only real criticism is with the stuff about Sandinista and what they did after the band split - it's a very high-level canter through, and there is nothing that will be new to 99% of readers.

But, like I say, overall a top read, best Clash book there is, and I've read them all :mrgreen:
The only disappointment for me was the Sandinista section. Not that it wasn't good, quite the opposite, it is just that that story deserves to be written into another equally great book.




Are you reading Marcus.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 5:02pm
by Chuck Mangione
101Walterton wrote:Are you reading Marcus.
He left to get pie.

Re: Author to the slaughter

Posted: 29 Jan 2011, 8:07am
by Marcus G
101Walterton wrote:
rudebhoy wrote:finished the book this morning, thought it was a great read overall, but like someone else said, did get a little bit bored by some of the stuff about chord structures and guitar effects, but given it's a book for Clash nuts rather than casual readers, can see that some folk would want to see that.

My only real criticism is with the stuff about Sandinista and what they did after the band split - it's a very high-level canter through, and there is nothing that will be new to 99% of readers.

But, like I say, overall a top read, best Clash book there is, and I've read them all :mrgreen:
The only disappointment for me was the Sandinista section. Not that it wasn't good, quite the opposite, it is just that that story deserves to be written into another equally great book.


Are you reading Marcus.

I'm reading AND eating pie. Some of us are capable of multi-tasking. What I'm not doing at the same time, though, is writing another book about the Clash.

Although they say never say never again, I'm saying never again.