Re: Author to the slaughter
Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 3:37pm
I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote:I'm gutted that you deleted that post.Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote:I'm gutted that you deleted that post.Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
Do I need to blow on the pie?Kory wrote:I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote:I'm gutted that you deleted that post.Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
I'm gutted for the pie.Wolter wrote:Do I need to blow on the pie?Kory wrote:I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote:I'm gutted that you deleted that post.Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
We need a safer community.Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.Wolter wrote:Do I need to blow on the pie?Kory wrote:I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote:I'm gutted that you deleted that post.Silent Majority wrote:*delete post.
thermo-nuclear101Walterton wrote:We need a safer community.Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.Wolter wrote:Do I need to blow on the pie?Kory wrote:I'm gutted that you're gutted.Rat Patrol wrote: I'm gutted that you deleted that post.
Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.
What kind?Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
Thermonuclear.Chuck Mangione wrote:Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.What kind?Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
That's a lot of blowing.Wolter wrote:Thermonuclear.Chuck Mangione wrote:Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.What kind?Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
This community isn't going to ensafen itself.Marky Dread wrote:That's a lot of blowing.Wolter wrote:Thermonuclear.Chuck Mangione wrote:Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.What kind?Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
I'm going to mark that down in the IMCT lexicon.Wolter wrote:This community isn't going to ensafen itself.Marky Dread wrote:That's a lot of blowing.Wolter wrote:Thermonuclear.Chuck Mangione wrote:Marky Dread wrote:I'm gutted for the pie.What kind?Marcus G wrote:Mmmm. Pie.
The only disappointment for me was the Sandinista section. Not that it wasn't good, quite the opposite, it is just that that story deserves to be written into another equally great book.rudebhoy wrote:finished the book this morning, thought it was a great read overall, but like someone else said, did get a little bit bored by some of the stuff about chord structures and guitar effects, but given it's a book for Clash nuts rather than casual readers, can see that some folk would want to see that.
My only real criticism is with the stuff about Sandinista and what they did after the band split - it's a very high-level canter through, and there is nothing that will be new to 99% of readers.
But, like I say, overall a top read, best Clash book there is, and I've read them all
He left to get pie.101Walterton wrote:Are you reading Marcus.
101Walterton wrote:The only disappointment for me was the Sandinista section. Not that it wasn't good, quite the opposite, it is just that that story deserves to be written into another equally great book.rudebhoy wrote:finished the book this morning, thought it was a great read overall, but like someone else said, did get a little bit bored by some of the stuff about chord structures and guitar effects, but given it's a book for Clash nuts rather than casual readers, can see that some folk would want to see that.
My only real criticism is with the stuff about Sandinista and what they did after the band split - it's a very high-level canter through, and there is nothing that will be new to 99% of readers.
But, like I say, overall a top read, best Clash book there is, and I've read them all
Are you reading Marcus.